South Korea — data protection and AI governance

Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA), in force since 2020-08-05. Supervisory authority: PIPC.

KRPriority jurisdiction — re-verified every cycleVerified on Lire en français

Data protection

Instrument
Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)
In force since
2020-08-05
Authority
PIPC
Penalties
4% CA ou 5B KRW
Key obligations
  • Consentement explicite
  • DPO obligatoire
  • Adéquation UE

What the engine decides here

These three attributes are what an agent decision depends on in this jurisdiction. They are modelled, sourced and dated.

Transfer regime
Restricted

Moving data out is restricted: it requires a recognised destination, or an explicit mechanism when the destination is not one.

Recognised destinations
EUFRDEITESBENLATPTIEFISEDKPLCZROBGHRHUSKSILTLVEECYMTLUGRNOISLIGB
Localisation mandate
Not modelled
Automated decision rights
Yes
Verified on
2026-08-14

Three decisions, computed just now

Same actions, this jurisdiction's context. These answers come out of the engine as the page renders — the same function the API calls.

  • Read an internal contract

    Low-risk operation

    ALLOW
  • Send a customer record to US_FED

    The transfer requires a mechanism

    APPROVE
  • Decide on a job application

    Decision reserved for a human

    DENY

Advisory decisions. StructureClerk decides; your infrastructure enforces.

AI governance

Framework
Basic Act on AI
Status
enacted
Date
2026-01-22
Key points
  • Cadre réglementaire
  • AI Safety Institute

Do your agents operate in South Korea?

The authority API makes these attributes executable: an ALLOW, APPROVE, DENY or ESCALATE decision before the agent acts, with signed evidence any third party can verify.

Other jurisdictions — Asia-Pacific